tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post3595303519240866161..comments2023-05-17T08:14:10.789-07:00Comments on Men, Women, and Society: The Open Thread: April 2015Aaron Sleazyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06704230661761052919noreply@blogger.comBlogger96125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-16024894928339646102015-05-09T10:59:17.181-07:002015-05-09T10:59:17.181-07:00"Besides, I find on this show Roosh looked ac..."Besides, I find on this show Roosh looked actually somewhat stylish, rather different from what I remember him presenting himself like in his youtube vids"<br />A professional production can make miracles.<br />And about Dr. Oz, you guys never saw this? Is Paul Janka (when he WAS legit) in questioned by Oz (or I should say the prosecutor?) about seduction. And the way Oz tries to make look Janka as some kind of "hyno-rapist" (you will undestand if you watch the vídeo) is so disgusting and totally un-ethical.<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ej7f_bdZkUMAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-31979545385127711442015-05-08T16:53:39.395-07:002015-05-08T16:53:39.395-07:00OMG, just watched the three "belladonna"...OMG, just watched the three "belladonna" girls from the audience opposing Roosh verbally. This is absurdity just on a massive scale. It's so unreal, if this weren't genuinely from a TV show it could be one of the most slick pieces of satire ever filmed.Marco_Polonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-21319123263265132672015-05-08T16:51:13.592-07:002015-05-08T16:51:13.592-07:00What an absurd and despicable show. I don't ow...What an absurd and despicable show. I don't own a TV myself so I didn't know about this show, just took a quick look online. What an utter waste of lifetime and energy to engage in this kind of "discussions" at all. I just can't believe it.<br /><br />The women verbally opposing Roosh are beyond help.Just goes on to show that "women" and "facing some hard/harsh truths" just doesn't go together…<br /><br />Besides, I find on this show Roosh looked actually somewhat stylish, rather different from what I remember him presenting himself like in his youtube vids…Marco_Polonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-77376448435656401592015-05-08T16:10:53.275-07:002015-05-08T16:10:53.275-07:00Even if it's scripted, it's still nice. ;)...Even if it's scripted, it's still nice. ;)Marco_Polonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-62095034023492335692015-05-02T12:54:34.533-07:002015-05-02T12:54:34.533-07:00I wonder of the fear of being called a creep is a ...I wonder of the fear of being called a creep is a big thing for guys? Anyone else aside from Novy?<br /><br />Of all the things that gave me problems with approaching women, being called a creep or a loser was never one of them. It just wasn't on my radar and wasn't on my consciousness. I don't think I was even aware of the issue. <br /><br />Its very interesting for me to hear that this is an issue for guys.<br /><br />Maybe guys who are exposed to feminist writing or things like that? I didn't go to college so maybe I was spared that highly feminized and politicized atmosphere.<br /><br />Last year I was going out a bit with a guy about 7 years younger than me (I'm 36 - and yes, still go to bars and clubs. All the time.) The idea of being a creep seemed on his mind. He cockblocked me twice by actually asking women I just met and was very touchy with right away - as is my way - if "didn't they find it creepy that I'm touching them". (nothing sexual, just hugs, putting my arm around, hand on shoulder, etc)<br /><br />Of course I stopped hanging out with him after that, but the fear of being thought a creep was clearly up there in his mind. Its clearly an issue for him. <br /><br />Interestingly, I HAVE been called a creep a few times by women. Largely deserved, I must admit. I was on too much molly and had no sense of boundaries.<br /><br />I just have a hard time thinking its a big thing for young guys. I think the sort of guy that is going to develop a fear about being a creep is probably too sensitive anyways and is unlikely to ever be able to approach women without problems. Some professor recently wrote about how much the fear of being called a creep deterred him, but that only proves my point. He admitted he was a very nerdy, very frightened guy. He would have feared women anyways.<br /><br />Fear of harsh rejection is quite enough. It doesn't seem to me to make any difference if that harsh rejection comes in the form of being called a creep or loser. Heck, fear of gentle rejection is fear enough. <br /><br />Women have always been rejecting men, harshly or nicely, and no guy needed to wait for the internet to see that. Going to school or any social event is enough. I doubt the net made any difference at all.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-4770960743496025152015-05-01T17:04:24.374-07:002015-05-01T17:04:24.374-07:00I've NEVER met a guy good with women that talk...<i>I've NEVER met a guy good with women that talks shit about fat women all the time. They just don't approach them!</i><br /><br />Conversely, super-attractive and popular women are never out there ranting about "creeps and losers". This is something a lot of guys don't seem to get (thanks to the anonymity of the internet).<br /><br />The internet created this thing where a generation of guys (that includes me), grew up seeing blogs and stories and forum posts with women whining and ranting about beeing creeped out by guys approaching them in imperfect ways. (and we assumed/projected it was sane, cute girls writing these posts, how little did we know).<br /><br />Many of us developed additional fears of flirting and approaching women... What we didn't realize until much later however, is that the women writing that crap were uggo feminists (not the cute hotties we imagined).<br /><br />In fact if you do overcome those fears of bothering women, you'll meet a ton of women and find out that its never the hotties whining about being pestered and bothered... It's the wannabe hotties.<br /><br />Put another way, it's the female equivalents of roosh who are obsessed with ranting about creeps & losers... Alek Novyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00727239708216696902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-4499205544720268622015-04-29T13:31:18.336-07:002015-04-29T13:31:18.336-07:00I just saw a quick summary of the episode. As muc...I just saw a quick summary of the episode. As much as I can't stand Roosh, I think Dr. Oz is just as much of a sleaze! You're right, sounds like Oz just said what his viewers wanted to hear. <br /><br />Roosh has nothing to help women lose weight on his site, so he's just being a huge asshole. Plus, he's supposedly good at picking up women. Why does he even care? I've NEVER met a guy good with women that talks shit about fat women all the time. They just don't approach them! Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12818523450780973176noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-38951679840445872482015-04-29T05:54:36.332-07:002015-04-29T05:54:36.332-07:00I've got to say that as slow and dumb as Roosh...I've got to say that as slow and dumb as Roosh is in general, I mostly agree with him on his appearance and what he stands for on this episode. There is no personality that will attract me to a 300 lbs woman, and Dr. Oz is definitely saying what he's saying FOR the millions of viewers. His reply that "he's saying this not because he's on the show, but because he beleives that" only enforces Roosh's argument. As in, no shit, why would they hire someone that wasn't 100% a male feminist for that kind of show. Fucking dishonest ape dancing around the fucking subject.<br /><br />But I think it's dishonest for Roosh to preface with caring about America's health. Aside from that, they're both completely dishonest with theirselves and need to shut the fuck up in front of these screeching clawing fembeasts. Fucking worried-faced surprised-look bitches who have never heard a negative word against fat people or theirselves without someone else whiteknighting them. gasp gasp gasp. appall. Women who watch TV shows like this are much more convinced by talk than action. You can talk their fat asses into anything, which is what Dr Oz does all day. Tophernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-36134466369393051942015-04-28T02:06:53.568-07:002015-04-28T02:06:53.568-07:00Roosh is going to be on Dr. Oz,
http://www.doctor...Roosh is going to be on Dr. Oz,<br /><br />http://www.doctoroz.com/episode/dr-oz-faces-notorious-online-fat-shamer-bullying-women-all-over-worldAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12818523450780973176noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-90323100526901941602015-04-26T05:27:24.042-07:002015-04-26T05:27:24.042-07:00Hahaha
The dialogue is faker than Donatella Versac...Hahaha<br />The dialogue is faker than Donatella Versace.Settebellonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-81110935038864282992015-04-24T12:49:19.443-07:002015-04-24T12:49:19.443-07:00Hi Anon,
I can relate to this very well.
The gi...Hi Anon,<br /><br />I can relate to this very well. <br /><br />The girlfriend/fiancé of a (not too close) friend of mine used to often ogle me "that way" (I at least guess it was "that way") and always giggle at my lame ass jokes even when the rest of the people listing to them would just roll their eyes.<br /><br />She did so even at their weeding party! 0_o<br /><br />Honestly, after the very day he first showed up with this chick in our clique our friendship slowly but surely went down the toilet. Out of our clique I was the only one not to be invited to his birthday/house parties etc.<br /><br />And I was the last one to be invited to his wedding. I would not have gone there if it weren’t for the rest of the clique encouraging me to do so (it was probably their intervention, that made him finally invite me in the first place).<br /><br />Two years have past since this weeding party and I never saw him again.<br />Needless to say I could not care less and nowadays I would not accept that kind of half assed invitation.<br /><br />Mind you, the rest of the gang has not seen him for more than a year as well, since he apparently is now pussy whipped and his wife got into some beef with another chick of the gang (his (former) best friend’s girlfriend by the way), causing a rift. <br /><br />Given the disrespectful way she treated him as his fiancé, I bet one of my testicles she will take him to the cleaners within the next 5 years or so.<br /><br />I suspected all the way she only married him, because his family is rather wealthy and she only got a degree in one of these exotic and unimportant subjects and only worked odd jobs.<br />Now she has him socially isolated (most of his friends are now alienated, his parents now live abroad),i.e. emotionally depended and basically can anal rape him whenever she pleases.<br /><br />Thank good I’m a fucking late bloomer! It gave me the time and peace of mind to reflect on this type of shit! Who knows, if my attempts at meeting women in my teens/early twenties had been more successful I might now find myself in a similar position like my former friend!<br /><br />By the way, Aaron, you did it! I’m going to block your blog now! The discussions are too interesting and I can’t resist to take part in them although I seriously have to get some urgent work done within the next few days: Shame on you! ;)<br /><br />BrentAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-2758944795149571702015-04-24T05:54:03.735-07:002015-04-24T05:54:03.735-07:00I have no idea whether its fake or real, but inter...I have no idea whether its fake or real, but interesting nonetheless.<br /><br />http://bw.braincy.com/she-thinks-hes-a-nobody-and-rejects-him-shes-up-for-a-surprise-when-she-finds-out-hes-famous/Alek Novyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00727239708216696902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-79025739584596026222015-04-23T21:01:34.207-07:002015-04-23T21:01:34.207-07:00About 'wine and dine a woman', I have a st...About 'wine and dine a woman', I have a story:<br />A friend of mine and I were friends of a girl in college. He knew her before than me. She also knew another friend of ours.<br />My 2 other friends made out with her once, they were drunk. It seems that my friend and her were somewhat attracted but he never dared to do something with her then.<br />I was also attracted to her but I was too yellow to do something, even when she showed attaction to me too.<br />9 months ago, my friend and her started to date. Only after 4 months she accepted to be his girlfriend. They hadn't sex then, probably they have it now.<br />But what striked me is that she was also horny for me too! I started to lose weight since a couple of years. In december, I met then by chance. I already had new clothing that fitted my figure. When she saw me, her eyes literally popped from her face, hugged me enthusiasticaly, and even hold and caress my hand (with my friend/his boyfriend there). And the following days, she was totally stalking me in Facebook.<br />The point is: my friend was dating her, dining her, doing all kind of things with her, but she was horny for me just because I lost some weight and started to be more careful with my style. That really struck me. He really is into her, and she would have fuck with me just because I became more attractive.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-21923965993909450772015-04-23T12:17:27.757-07:002015-04-23T12:17:27.757-07:00Just LOL at one of the latest posts on ROK by Troy...Just LOL at one of the latest posts on ROK by Troy Francis. <br /><br />http://www.returnofkings.com/62042/how-to-game-a-hot-french-girl<br /><br />I think anyone who read "Club Game" would agree that Francis left out of the part where his alarm clock went off and he awoke from this dream.<br /><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12818523450780973176noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-5277645346710394442015-04-23T00:10:30.991-07:002015-04-23T00:10:30.991-07:00Good text.
I am convinced those feelings are a l...Good text.<br /><br /> I am convinced those feelings are a large reason why nowadays a lot of women eventually file for a divorce, because they cannot deny their feelings of disdain towards their mate any longer. I wager that this is not a new phenomenon, but has been part of the female psychological make-up ever since. Back then they quenched their frustration by reading pulp romance novels or getting treated for "hysteria" by doctors (which is how the vibrator got invented btw.). The only difference is that today women CAN get divorced without being stigmatized, that they CAN earn their own money and that they are encouraged to show this disdain openly, should they wish to do so. Only, as parasites they don't really profit from any of these achievements.<br /><br />Of course the reason for this is rooted the parasitic character of female existence. Women rarely "cherish" men for their pure being, but are mainly interested in what men can do for them, i. e. as providers of sex, semen or money/security and/or as emotional tampon. If they cannot get anything of that value from you, you are merely worthless to them and invisible and they will not give you anything of value in exchange. Many a woman is being tormented by that nagging fear of ascertaining whether the current host she's managed to get hold of is really "a good deal", whether he stays that way and whether het emotional grip on him (i.e. "romantic love") is still tight, so he won't leave them even when she's providing miserable sex to him, thereby cutting her off from his valuable "services". Even today women for the most part are NOT able to survive on their own and get anything of real substance done. (I'd say that's a big reason why prostitution still exist, since it benefits those women: making comparatively large sums of money with comparatively little skills or investment.) And even if they actually could, they'd rather take the easy way (because it's their female "entitlement") and have a man ("husband") securely provide for them, because that is the core ingredient of their "princess"-fantasies, to have a man "sweep them off their feet", spoil & pamper them, fulfill all their needs and never doubt that arrangement, so that she can ultimately "relaaaax". (This may sound harsh and unfair, but I swear this is only what I've been able to observe time and again and again. I wish it were different, but it just doesn't seem to.)<br /><br />Feminism and the encouragement of absurd levels of female entitlement have only exacerbated this detrimental internal impulse. <br /><br />I would say, that this effect - together with the negative effects of the modern, "flexible" capitalist economy on heterosexzal pair-bonding - is the main cause for the constant decline in Western birthrates, which is impossible to reverse short or mid term-wise. <br /><br />"Neo-liberal" economic premises in concert with prevalent heterosexual misandry are bringing the West down, since the pyramid/ponzi-scheme of capitalist society requires a constant influx of new suckers. Heightened rates of immigration only serve to increase the problem of genetic colonialization though, so there's no viable solution in this direction either. <br /><br />This might sound bleak to some, but my very personal opinion is, that "civilization" itself, ever since it got created with the turn to agriculture, has overall been just one big massive failure anyway and never provided the majority of human beings with even the most basic necessities for survival - this seems to be part of its pedigree, so why ever expect it to be the other way around? ;)<br />We were actually much better off as foragers (not the least in terms if SEX).Marco_Polonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-73579243241481411762015-04-22T15:10:59.297-07:002015-04-22T15:10:59.297-07:00Hey James,
you might to want to check this out:
...Hey James,<br /><br />you might to want to check this out:<br /><br />https://matingselfishness.wordpress.com/2013/07/05/attraction-sex-vs-transactional-sex/<br /><br />I quote the first two paragraphes:<br /><br />"Male and female sexuality is different. A man will only have sex with a woman to whom he is physically attracted. She must at least turn him on enough to give him an erection. A woman will also have sex with a guy who turns her on; call this attraction-based sex. However, unlike a man she also has the capacity to have transactional sex, which is sex in exchange for some benefit from the man. Things women will exchange for sex include: money, status, listening to her shit, doing things for her, buying her gifts, etc.<br /><br />The two modes are not mutually exclusive. Most sex that takes place is some mixture of attraction-based and transactional. With escorts it’s typically purely transactional, though an escort may sometimes be attracted to her client, it’s a rare bonus for her. Fucking a stranger in the bathroom within 10 minutes of meeting her is purely attraction-based. An actress who fucks a producer to get a role – transactional. Fuck buddy sex – mostly attraction based."<br /><br /><br />"It's a sad story for both parties involved." Especially the male party ;)<br /><br />This is why Aaron suggests to fuck a woman rather soon, see how you match in bed and if there is some comonality between the two of you. <br /><br />Never whine and dine some random chick for months without ever getting ass!<br /><br />There is nothing wrong with paying women for sex and company (and IMHO for most men it's almost impossible to get some pussy without at least some kind of (minor) finacial investment), but if you want to do so, better see a hooker! It's way more economic and efficient!<br /><br />http://lifestylejourney.blogspot.de/2011/10/paying-for-sex-is-more-alpha-than-using.html<br /><br />"You are only spending money, as opposed to money plus time plus effort, or time plus effort at the very least." <br /><br />Value your time, your energy, your money and yourself!<br /><br />Just a little rant after mid night ;)<br /><br />BrentAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-79264732399441824362015-04-22T14:28:12.316-07:002015-04-22T14:28:12.316-07:00"I know it's hard to take a guy serious t..."I know it's hard to take a guy serious that's wearing sunglasses indoors."<br /><br />STOP PLAYa HATING YOU FUCK!!11! <br />He is emulating the king of ELFA-Mails himself, Mr. Vin Diesel aka. Riddic, in Pitch Black to attract virgin HB11s! Dontcha know?!?! ;)<br /><br />No, but seriously, this one was hilarious! Guy sits there... LIKE A BOSS! :D<br />Thanks for sharing!<br /><br />What's next? Breathe like an alpha? Fart like an alpha? Waste your time with corny pua videos on youtube that poison your mind, steal your time and get you exactly nowhwere... like an alpha? :D<br /><br />BrentAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-56551217418984051112015-04-22T14:12:05.053-07:002015-04-22T14:12:05.053-07:00"This is why I consider that line of messagin..."This is why I consider that line of messaging to be a form of mental abuse and GASLIGHTING." The term gaslighting fits perfectly in this context!<br /><br />"So you probably dreamt your experience. Your experiences aren't valid."<br /><br />I must have date raped her with a dozen invisible guns I keept floating around her head all the time via my psychic patriachal powers. Why else should she have slept with me, if she OBVIOUSLY was not intrested at all? ;)<br /><br />Thank you for batteling these (fem-)tards and trolls! You might not convince them, but I and I'm sure also many other readers get a lot out of this debates. <br /><br />It might just be a sophisticated way of procrastinating for you, but you nonetheless probably changed quite a few lives of young men for the better! Kudos to you!<br /><br />BrentAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-35304789876062546302015-04-22T11:55:22.908-07:002015-04-22T11:55:22.908-07:00I've been reading your material for quite some...I've been reading your material for quite some time now Aaron and I must say, KEEP IT UP!<br /><br />I understand you and the other commentators here have busy lives but I swear this place is like a reality check and a breathe of fresh air from all the lies spewed across the PUA and "Manosphere."<br /><br />While the PUAs are bad enough as it is, I'm starting to come a conclusion that the "manosphere" itself is perpetuating lies to its audience. There is a lot of talk about the need to "perform well", "dominance cues", and "status displays" that get thrown around a lot. When in truth, attraction is much more simple than these people make it out to be. <br /><br />I came across this book 2 days ago off another blog and I'm pretty sure you and your readership will find it very interesting. While it has its own faults, the primary message of the book is fucking gold! Chapter 2 is a fucking wake-up call.<br /><br />Give it a read:<br />Pandora's Box - The Men's Sexual Revolution<br />http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=03540465121329501441<br /><br />An excerpt:<br /><br />"There are 2 very distinct kinds of “attraction” a woman has for a man. One is based on material needs, the other is based on<br />sexual attraction. Romantic interest is purely sexual. Practical interest is the typical mercenary mindset of a woman<br />seeking a marriage partner. Real, heartfelt interest is usually reserved for the guys who also happen to be hot enough<br />in her eyes for a short term fling. If a girl thinks you're cute, she typically gives off subtle signals quite quickly.<br />Romantic interest carries a subtle sexual undertone right from the outset.<br />...<br />Women are very pragmatic about relationships, by and large. They are strongly pressured to conform to a certain mode of<br />behavior. They constantly have to fight their innermost feelings and often underestimate how important a strong physical<br />attraction toward a mate really is for a stable, fulfilling long term partnership. They realize they have to make sacrifices, but<br />many of them still pine for a man they are truly attracted to. Many women have to deal with a lot of internalized frustration<br />as that feeling never goes away. No matter how much she might try to convince herself intellectually that her current mate<br />is a great catch, those feelings have their way of creeping back in. It's a sad story for both parties involved."James C.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-5801431788444032352015-04-22T09:11:49.150-07:002015-04-22T09:11:49.150-07:00If it was not for Alek Novy I don't know how d...<i>If it was not for Alek Novy I don't know how depressed I might be today. For pretty much all my teens and eraly to mid twenties I felt, lets say, sexually undesirable and suspected beeing inferior and defunct, doomed basically. He teached me, that my problem was not, that 99,9999999% of the female population considered me "unworthy", but that I could not spot those females, that consider me attractive (still my main problem to this day, although I improved). His rants in the comments section hammered this meassage in my poor PUA-BS riddled brain.</i><br /><br />This is why I consider that line of messaging to be a form of mental abuse and GASLIGHTING.<br /><br />Feminists and other bitter whiny women have been using it forever (including the troll who got banned on here and BlackPill's)... <br /><br />The message is (the same people make both point A and point B)<br /><br />A) "If a woman has ANY interest in you, she will make it absolutely clear and unmistakable, if a woman isn't showing 100% clear unambigious interest, she DOESN'T LIKE YOU"<br /><br />B) "If no women like you, it means you are defunct, rotten or evil in some way, you are an utter waste of DNA, you must be screwed up in some way" <br /><br />Combine A & B.... and what do you get? You see that <br /><br />1) even the worst scum of men have dates and lays and women crushing on them [criminals, wife-beaters, drug-sellers, abusive jerks, super-selfish and mentally screwed up guys] <br /> <br />2) you were told that if women don't show interest in you (which remember comes in 100% unmistakable unambigious and super-overt ways)... THEN <br /><br />3) You must be even more messed up than all these messed up guys who DO have dates.<br /><br />It's basic logic. So either the messaging is wrong and false (women don't actually show super-duper overt unmistakable signs of interest), or you really are the worst waste of DNA ever to be born, since even the scummiest of scummy men have dates, lays etc...<br /><br /><i>No intense eye connntact, no big leaning towards me, not much smileing, no hair flipping, she's not talking very much, although beeing female ;) etc.<br /><br />I still had quite passionate sex with her 60 minuets after we met.<br />So much for "enthusiastic consent", dear Fem-Tards!</i><br /><br />As you know, this is impossible according to femi-tards. So you probably dreamt your experience. Your experiences aren't valid.<br /><br /><i>Please write your books when I'm still in my teens next time ;)</i><br /><br />That's such a huge pain-point for me. Why didn't Sleazy come around 10 years earlier... I feel jealous of guys today. While you can still get scammed, at least there's an alternative.<br /><br />(I feel old saying this) - back in our day there were no alternatives, you had to pick between the feminist/mainstream narrative or the pua narrative. That was it.Alek Novyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00727239708216696902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-68964419253813503082015-04-21T14:49:47.520-07:002015-04-21T14:49:47.520-07:00Brent, I don't think he's joking. I know ...Brent, I don't think he's joking. I know it's hard to take a guy serious that's wearing sunglasses indoors. <br /><br />The best part is the 5:45 min mark and on. I fell over I was laughing so hard. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12818523450780973176noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-89910265152516458572015-04-21T14:10:45.182-07:002015-04-21T14:10:45.182-07:00There is a lot of wisdom in those two comments of ...There is a lot of wisdom in those two comments of yours, Marco!<br /><br />I'm still busy at this late hour, so I'm just going to focus on one of the many good points you raised:<br /><br />"As Alek Novy put it once: the idea, that (non-pro) women above the age of 12 give out overt sexual signals in social gatherings is ridicolus and comes stems largely form movies or commercials."<br /><br />If it was not for Alek Novy I don't know how depressed I might be today. For pretty much all my teens and eraly to mid twenties I felt, lets say, sexually undesirable and suspected beeing inferior and defunct, doomed basically. He teached me, that my problem was not, that 99,9999999% of the female population considered me "unworthy", but that I could not spot those females, that consider me attractive (still my main problem to this day, although I improved). His rants in the comments section hammered this meassage in my poor PUA-BS riddled brain.<br /><br />LOL, I resently met up with a chick I met via online dating. I pick her up at the train station and we walk to a cafe nearby. My mood basically hits rock bottom because of her closed up body language and her beeing quite, she seems disapointed. She looks better than in her profile, I feel uglier in real life, so this voices in my head tell me: "She does not like what she sees in real life, although ypur profile got her intrested. Let's end this as soon as possible and then head home alone. Sould not have made the effort." etc.<br /><br />Long story short, I nonetheless tried to escalate, she accepts all my advances, but that's how far her signaling her intressted goes (at least while we are still in the cafe). Accepting me holding her hand, accepting me resting my hand on her knee, than on the inner side of her tight, her pressing her legs together while my hand is still resting on the inside of her tight, me kissing her cheek, caressing her ass and so on.<br />Her body language still seems pretty closed up to me during the escalation.<br /><br />No intense eye connntact, no big leaning towards me, not much smileing, no hair flipping, she's not talking very much, although beeing female ;) etc.<br /><br />I still had quite passionate sex with her 60 minuets after we met.<br />So much for "enthusiastic consent", dear Fem-Tards!<br /><br />"Of course Master Sleazy already wrote about this as well, I guess his text on this matter is titled "On the ambiguous signals of women" ;)"<br /><br />Club Game drives this point of female weak and ambigious signals home very well and also includes a chapter (or two?) about how to recognisze attracted/intrested females in the Club. A job very well done, Meister Sleazy! <br />Please write your books when I'm still in my teens next time ;)<br /><br />BrentAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-88473996837507365292015-04-21T10:02:04.464-07:002015-04-21T10:02:04.464-07:00Mitchel, this is not supposed to be satire, is it?...Mitchel, this is not supposed to be satire, is it? <br /><br />Mind you in the coloumn with the video suggestions one video of this guy appears, that is called "how to be realistic" or something! :D<br /><br />And of course you can't rate this video and you can't leave a comment, too! <br />Probably because of all the haters ;)<br /><br />Look at these two gems (WARNIG: do not watch with a full bladder): <br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LL20pAUrgR0<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-e7vOSMpDc<br /><br />I think Aaron writes in debunking that quite a few of Bad Boys students ended beeing beaten up.<br />I'm racking my briain why this might be the case ;)<br /><br />BrentAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-19632121633745054472015-04-21T08:53:21.360-07:002015-04-21T08:53:21.360-07:00Just an addendum… and on a more constructive note:...Just an addendum… and on a more constructive note:<br /><br />- The uppish passage about women and the decoding of their various instances of eye-contact is actually quite a good description of the significance of such female overextertions. For all the "dorks" who "just can't get a clue" to save their life this could be an eye-opening (no pun intended) read. The only caveat to it would be, that for those guys who are a bit bratty (like me) the time to wait for EC #3 to finally occur is a waste of time. Hitting up women w/o strong EC preliminary and – in case of getting snobbish feedback – toasting them verbally for a few minutes before moving on, IS fun no matter what Ms. Cooper might be thinking.<br /><br />- The female author really believes the dangerous notion women like to tell to each other about the "affirmative YES"-signals that women would give out in case of sexual interest. Whenever I talk to women about this, they are very open about the fact, that they do actively flirt with guys and give unmistakeably overt sexual signals to the hunks, they might be interested in. Having them perform such "signals" right therein front of me or observing them "in field" in signal-worthy sitiuations of course displays a highly different story. Their signals are weak or vague at best, most of the time impossible to discern from inactivity or even mild disinterest. For men, who heightened their awareness to female subcommunications such signals might be easier to decipher but Joe Average is totally lost in this regard. Of course Master Sleazy already wrote about this as well, I guess his text on this matter is titled "On the ambiguous signals of women" ;)<br /><br />As Alek Novy put it once: the idea, that (non-pro) women above the age of 12 give out overt sexual signals in social gatherings is ridicolus and comes stems largely form movies or commercials.<br /><br />- the choice of the headline image for this text is WEIRD: a woman staring at a pile of greenbacks like a predator on a prey: http://static.yourtango.com/cdn/farfuture/yYV0XXWXsDyZE8xr8OPJNSHXe15Dc0it_peetPPyVSo/mtime:1427903612/sites/default/files/styles/listing_big/public/image_blog/woman-money.jpg<br />Did the female mastermind author of this article choose this image on purpose? Well if she wants to deliver the subconcious message, that women are very much interested in male money, then this picture is a sure hit. I'd love to suggest womewhat of a facetios alternative: http://i.imgbox.com/abm2Lh6V.jpgMarco_Polonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-34363483124454075502015-04-21T00:19:50.335-07:002015-04-21T00:19:50.335-07:00Another bizarre piece of writing by a deluded woma...Another bizarre piece of writing by a deluded woman. Women for the most part are either unable or unwilling to be at par with men with regards to earning power and wealth creation for society. Today they could of course but it's not happening and the milliins spent on affirmative action haven't convinced women to choose occupations like software engineer, sewage worker or car mechanic instrad of work-simulating secretary. Women do rely on men for comfortable survival, men are the predominant creators of civilization and culture and women require male sperm for procreation. There is no entirely "independent" life-arrangement for women, it's simply impossible and anyone suggesting the opposite to females is dangerously appealing to bloated female self-esteem.<br /><br />Also, if unavoidable, it's easier for men to live without women or with a substantial lack of female affection, simply because this is the predominant state for most men during their entire life anyway. Women control and limit access to sex and even may deny themselves sexual gratification for this to work in order to effect fake scarcity of pussy, thus rising the price they could make provider-men pay for it.<br /><br />The tragic aspect in it is that, many women come to understand their essential need for men usually at an age, when their beauty, youthfulness & fertility are massively waning, e.g. around reaching 40 and onwards. THEN they try to make up for this loss by becoming more approachable, less capricious and so on, but nobody really wants them at that age any more. Aaron wrote a great article about this phenomenon titled "The biggest dating mistake women make". Their bad...Marco_Polonoreply@blogger.com