tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post9064228650181449026..comments2023-05-17T08:14:10.789-07:00Comments on Men, Women, and Society: Does every girl have her price?Aaron Sleazyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06704230661761052919noreply@blogger.comBlogger66125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-40979180727872287142015-05-22T23:00:24.682-07:002015-05-22T23:00:24.682-07:00Hey Aaron
Just a pointer that the cuckoldry numbe...Hey Aaron<br /><br />Just a pointer that the cuckoldry number is most likely wrong.<br />Razib Khan of GNXP explains here. http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/06/the-paternity-myth-the-rarity-of-cuckoldry/<br /><br />He has more posts on this as well if you google them.Contemplationisthttp://contemplationist.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-40807957092524600722015-03-21T08:44:08.884-07:002015-03-21T08:44:08.884-07:00Just read up on that Facebook COO Sandberg shtick:...Just read up on that Facebook COO Sandberg shtick: I've gotta say this is easily the most absurd stuff I've seen in quite some time.<br /><br />First of all; nothing relevant or worthwhile comes out of Facebook. EVER. They are today’s AOL. Taking the fraud Sandberg as role model is totally ridicolous in its own right.<br /><br />Secondly, isn't it any wonder more and more single men of a certain age could care less now for marriage? And yet statistically/allegedly 80% of men want to be good fathers? <br /><br />Also, way back in 1971 Esther Vilar wrote in her classic book "The Manipulated Man": "Men have been conditioned by women, not unlike the way Pavlov conditioned his dogs, into becoming their slaves… A Man is a human being who works while a woman chooses to let a man provide for her and her children in return for carefully dispensed praise and sex." Mrs. Vilar got death threats from feminist organisations for what she said, so I find it ironic that 44 years later "one of the world's wealthiest working women" can publicly validate her viewpoint and STILL be called a "feminist" without any substantial public criticism. Hahaha…<br /><br />Now what if some hubby follows her advice by going, „oh, my wife does the laundry, she does almost all the housework - that's her job. And I’m fine with it, cuz I DON'T want more sex. The prostitutes I frequent are better and far less of a hassle.“ **ROTFL**<br /><br />And taking marital advice from Sheryl Sandberg seems like taking fashion advice from Lady Gaga: even if you think it's a good idea, you won't be able to afford it. Why would a woman of the likes of Sheryl S. have any wisdom or indeed any interest in telling us men how to succeed in the boardroom or anywhere else?! Marco_Polonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-13447466317974966942015-03-20T07:03:39.480-07:002015-03-20T07:03:39.480-07:00Thanks for the answer, that's what I do too. I...Thanks for the answer, that's what I do too. I refuse games and I refuse chasing. Either she makes it super easy for me, either I stop talking immediately to her.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-87470699142837048182015-03-20T06:52:38.035-07:002015-03-20T06:52:38.035-07:001. If the girl heavily makes out with you within 1...<i>1. If the girl heavily makes out with you within 15 minutes of meeting but only spread her legs on fourth or fifth date, what does that mean ? She's really prude or she just isn't enough attracted to you ?</i><br /><br />How the fuck would I know? I'm not psychic.<br /><br />The point is that there are many conflicting drives and mating is very complex. Nobody knows which part of which of her drives influences what how much in one specific situation.<br /><br />All I know is (for my personal life) is that I only consider women who required zero-barter to sleep with me. That's just me and my own personal value system, everyone has to create their own value system.<br /><br />My own value system is (but this only came about after laying every type of girl I'd wanted to lay at least once)...<br /><br />- I refuse anything less than fair. I only accept a process where she puts in at least 50% of the effort to make things happen.<br /><br />- If I detect even the slightest amount of games, bartering, i delete & block her number, block her on facebook and never talk to her for as long as she's alive<br /><br />That's just my personal (extremist) value system. I don't think anyone should model me. I'm a narcissistic and bitter over-ambitious over-achiever who's trying to be super-succesful at several fields at once. So I have super-crazy boundaries*.<br /><br />*-Not just for women, for male friendships and business partnerships also<br /><br />Alek Novyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00727239708216696902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-85147425124650041112015-03-20T06:45:52.504-07:002015-03-20T06:45:52.504-07:00@Anonymous, it's not that simple
That would o...@Anonymous, it's not that simple<br /><br />That would only work if she has sexual attraction to you (not merely romantic), and you can differentiate the two.<br /><br />If she has a lot of romantic attraction, but little sexual attraction (she just needs a little bit more pursuing to accept you as as a boyfriend provider), an offer of money would probably trigger a slap, not sex.<br /><br />And even the biggest sloots who sugar-daddy like crazy would get offended if the offer is done in a too-direct a way. <br /><br />Alek Novyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00727239708216696902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-69444647141911905162015-03-19T15:06:10.573-07:002015-03-19T15:06:10.573-07:00Interesting.
Now I have some questions Alek :
1....Interesting.<br /><br />Now I have some questions Alek :<br /><br />1. If the girl heavily makes out with you within 15 minutes of meeting but only spread her legs on fourth or fifth date, what does that mean ? She's really prude or she just isn't enough attracted to you ? Note that I'm only talking about girls that quickly make out with you and that are very into it, I'm NOT talking about girls that don't even want to make out with you before second date (and when you make out, you feel that she isn't really into it).<br /><br />2. So now that every woman is a prostitute, are we doomed ? What do we do ? I'm still a hopeless romantic. What do I do ? I will not be able to enjoy a LTR again now that I know that. The foundation of a relationship for me is that the girl genuinely likes me. I'm not interested in having an "exclusive prostitute".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-34343580508357910742015-03-19T14:28:26.348-07:002015-03-19T14:28:26.348-07:00Damn, Alek, I love you ! You're a genius.
Now...Damn, Alek, I love you ! You're a genius.<br /><br />Now I will try on every girl that seems attracted but a little bit reluctant that I will give them 100$ if they come home with me tonight hahaha ! And then I will try 80$, and then 50$, etc.<br /><br />Let's see how many lays I can get with that !<br /><br />Hahaha.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-3172947888918188222015-03-14T09:26:54.172-07:002015-03-14T09:26:54.172-07:00On the subject of "all women as prostitutes&q...On the subject of "all women as prostitutes" and "payment doesn't have to be in fiat currency" - there are now major stories, a multi-million campaign and editorial pieces running promoting Sandberg's "we prostitute out for laundry". (it's even on the cover of time magazine, and running during all NBA games)<br /><br />Literally, there's now a mainstream campaign where guys are being advertised that they need to pay for sex with "chores". I don't even want to get into a debate about that campaign in specific, its merit, feminists etc (it's off-topic anyway).<br /><br />The on topic thing here is that... almost all women do sell sex, even if the price isn't in fiat currency. To me "prostitution" is whenever you trade sex for something, or if you use sex as payment for something. The payment doesn't have to be in actual bank issued paper notes. <br /><br />The only times sex is free is when its:<br /><br />a) for reproductive purposes<br />b) for pleasure, she just want to feel the pleasure of having sex with you<br /><br />Any time it's not for A or B... it is prostitution. Alek Novyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00727239708216696902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-57762252661512006282015-03-08T13:36:47.990-07:002015-03-08T13:36:47.990-07:00Alek, number 1 way women insult each other is by c...Alek, number 1 way women insult each other is by calling each other sluts. If you want to insult a man you won't call him a manwhore(that would probably be a compliment), instead you would insinuate that his woman is having sex behind his back...<br /><br />Point is that all women eventually do want to settle down and having promiscuous past lowers marriage value for women much more than for men.<br /><br />And not only do such women have lower marriage value compared to promiscuous men, they are also generally looked down upon by their peers ie other women and 'normal' men.<br /><br />This is the double standard I'm referring to. I wasn't referring to the fact that men and women use different standard for long term relationships. I'm referring to the fact that in context of long term relationships women will be punished for same kind of behavior(promiscuity) much more than men.<br />------------------<br /><br />Men are said to have much lower standards for short term relationships, but plenty of men have turned down sex with okay looking girls because they thought it would lower their value in the eyes of their peers. I can only imagine how much stronger this effect is for women because they are judged much more negatively.<br /><br />On the other hand having sex with someone popular(or very attractive) raises your status - I guess this could explain why average looking people hook up much easier after they become celebrities, even small-time celebrities such as being a guitar player in a crappy band.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-71707017765323269192015-03-08T05:18:28.115-07:002015-03-08T05:18:28.115-07:00I think the blog TagTheSponsor has been mentioned ...I think the blog TagTheSponsor has been mentioned here before. In one of their recent posts they revealed the story about prostitution among Polish Instagram "models". There were 10 girls mentioned and they all agreed to be shit on by Arabic royal for 25k USD. Group sex was priced at 10k USD. The whole deal was brokered by Polish Playboy model who resides in Dubai. There has been massive uproar in Poland as the links to girls FB and Insta profiles has been posted on Wykop websiteAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08975533301181456126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-4501730476214545502015-03-07T22:29:34.876-08:002015-03-07T22:29:34.876-08:00Great comment, Alek.
Ironically, all this reminds ...Great comment, Alek.<br />Ironically, all this reminds me that shitty book of "50 shades of Gray". If Mr. Gray wasn't attractive, young and billionaire, well, no girl wouldn't even give him a blow job.<br />And as you point up, the thing that makes us angry is that bullshit thing of "well, I don't like you, but I don't see any problem in letting you dine and wine me until I got bored of you or I got horny and fuck you".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-86729500895071219832015-03-07T17:22:32.354-08:002015-03-07T17:22:32.354-08:00@Original Posted who refused intimacy for banknote...@Original Posted who refused intimacy for banknotes<br /><br /><i>But because I have morals, integrity and character, I would never have been part of it. </i><br /><br />That "morality" was invented by society and merely says "don't accept banknotes when performing this transaction, only accept and ask for other less obvious currencies".<br /><br />- This morality you speak of frowns up women who charge a guy $500 in actual bank issued bills<br /><br />- This morality you speak of approves of women who charge the same guy $500 in time, effort, dates, dinners and other resources equivalent to $500<br />Alek Novyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00727239708216696902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-59725792704304671972015-03-07T17:15:57.524-08:002015-03-07T17:15:57.524-08:00@Anonymous
There is no contradiction...
We (the ...@Anonymous<br /><br />There is no contradiction...<br /><br />We (the guys who want to have tons of casual sex and bang chicks in 3 minutes from meeting them) are not the same group as the guys who call women sloots and hores for doing these things. <br /><br />It's only a contradiction if the same guy believes both things at the same time.<br /><br /><b>But wait alek, you just ranted about girls blowing guys in 3 minutes from knowing them!!</b><br /><br />As I clarified. Guys in our group (who have no problem with casual sex), aren't mad that a chick bangs guys in bathrooms 3 minutes from knowing them.<br /><br />We are angry if she LIES about it as a way to PROCUR more resources.<br /><br />Does the clarification make sense? I don't have a problem with a girl putting out the same night... IN FACT I DISRESPECT girls who WON'T bang me the first night. <br /><br />I (in my own personal life) anti-slut-shame, like I actually call girls PRUDES if they state a belief about postponing sex on purpose.<br /><br />If a girl tells you (or rather insinuates) that she is PHYSICALLY INCAPABLE of having sex in 3 minutes, yet she's only saying this in order to procur RESOURCES from you (attention, dates, gifts, whatever) ---> THEN THIS is manipulation.<br /><br />Is it more clear now? Guys are fundamentally upset with the manipulation part of it, not the fact she was easy to other guys.<br /><br /><b>It's like this</b><br /><br />- I'm ok with the fact you banged some dude on the beach in 3 minutes from knowing him<br /><br />- I'm fine with the fact that I'm not as hot as he was, so you need additional payment<br /><br />- Just don't lie to me about it, and pretend like you are physically incapable of having sex quickly... just be upfront about your bartering, don't lie, don't manipulate. State your price and I'll decide if I want to pay it.<br /><br /><b>But, but but... Double Standards!!!</b><br /><br />You're saying this as if double standards are wrong? <br /><br />If men prefer relationships with less sexual women, what's your point? They have every right to do so. The fact that you want to have a ton of casual sex with highly sexual girls, and then marry a less sexual girl is wrong how exactly? <br /><br /><b>WOMEN DO IT TOO</b><br /><br />Studies are clear that women do most of their casual sex with one type of guy, then marry or get serious with another type of guy. Why is this an issue we need to call a "double standard" or imply its immoral?<br /><br />Why is it immoral to have a different standard for hookups vs marriage? Both men and women do it, and its rooted deep in biology.<br /><br /><i>>If you give 300$ to a prostitute then it is incentive.But if you make lot of money (and you also have decent physical appearance) then does this fall under long term sexual attraction which makes woman more sexually attracted to you on physiological level or is it just incentive for her to act on pre-existing sexual attraction which is based purely on your looks?</i><br /><br />Dunno, sounds like it can be both or a mix of the two... Alek Novyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00727239708216696902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-17267252135798548532015-03-07T15:06:10.853-08:002015-03-07T15:06:10.853-08:00hi i want to say to ALEK good post as always i lik...hi i want to say to ALEK good post as always i like, this economy and women<br />are spoken on the same terms.<br /><br />the other guy i think you got it wrong incentive doesnt increase sexual attraction<br />sexual attractrion is purely based on your looks,<br />its that when you give her money or its proovable that u have money,<br />you play to her female entitlement biological calling, this isnt exactly sexual.<br />infact long term attraction is purely incentive based, its something u have and others dont that makes well off compared to others, the female wants to get some of that shit to her , driven by her entitlement.<br /><br />and this incentive is traded for attraction points, its sexual attraction get replaced<br />by economical attraction.LazyLifehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17166776768659209547noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-87075298931426954142015-03-07T13:58:58.773-08:002015-03-07T13:58:58.773-08:00Alek, I love your explanation! I'd like to com...Alek, I love your explanation! I'd like to comment a bit on "Men are angry about women lying about it" part though. It seems that there is a contradiction in men's behavior. We want to have lot of casual sex but at the same time we are quick to judge and stigmatize women for being promiscuous.<br /><br />Here we talk about how women shouldn't have such high standards for short term relationships, they shouldn't play hard to get etc... but at the same time lot of men label promiscuous women as sluts, immoral and proclaim they aren't long-term relationship material. Whenever woman acts on her sexual impulse she is risking lowering her social status.<br /><br />It is double-standard in our society, promiscuous man is labeled as stud while promiscuous woman is labeled as a slut.<br /><br />Part Two:<br />As I said, I love your "all women are prostitutes" explanation. This isn't to bash women but just to drive point home. I think your explanation can be succinctly stated as sex = sexual attraction + incentive<br /><br />Incentive can come in many forms. First to come to mind is money, but it can also be things such as bragging rights(if you are celebrity) or making her feel special by giving her lot of attention, going on dates etc...<br /><br />Sexual attraction is composed out of two components: long term and short term attraction. Short term attraction is based purely on your looks while long term attraction is based on other qualities such as personality, artistic skills, socioeconomic status etc..<br /><br />Now here is the interesting part. How is incentive related to long term sexual attraction?<br /><br />If you give 300$ to a prostitute then it is incentive. But if you make lot of money (and you also have decent physical appearance) then does this fall under long term sexual attraction which makes woman more sexually attracted to you on physiological level or is it just incentive for her to act on pre-existing sexual attraction which is based purely on your looks?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-61263143969216054862015-03-07T11:15:17.150-08:002015-03-07T11:15:17.150-08:00The consensus isn't that all women will take a...The consensus isn't that all women will take any Money (bank notes) to have sex with anyone.<br /><br />Even a professional street-Walker will refuse a 60 year-old obese guy with super-weird fetishes. What if that guy was younger, and "kinda cute"? Would you have still said no?<br /><br /><b>The consensus is a bit more subtle. The consensus here is that:</b><br /><br />- Most women are willing to accept money in exchange for attraction points<br /><br />- If she requires AT LEAST 90% attraction to have a one-night-stand with a dude "for free"... she'll also have a one-night stand with a guy who's a 70%-er, but offers 100$ on top of it. (most women will)<br /><br />- And the women who won't accept monetary exchange for a guy buying those additional 20% through actual cash?<br /><br />- They also sell that additional 20% in exchange for goods and resources. They require other resources such as attention, pursuing, dates and dinners.<br /><br />So yes, all women ARE prostitutes. Even if the exchange isn't in the shape of banknotes. So called self-proclaimed "good women" merely charge a different currency... It's still the same transaction economically speaking. There doesn't have to be an exchange of fiat currency for it to be prostitution.<br /><br /><b>Men are angry about women lying about it</b><br /><br />The same woman who says she's not that kind of girl and needs you to court her for 3 months to "earn the sex", will blow some dude on a beach in Rio De Janeiro, when on vacation, 3 minutes after meeting him. (or she'll do it for money).<br /><br />A feminist might come in and accuse these angry men of "being entitled" and "you just think you're entitled to sex"...<br /><br />The answer would be "I don't fucking feel entitled to sex, I just fucking feel entitled to HONESTY". Don't lie to my face that your body supposedly needs 3 months to prepare for sex... just say you're asking for an exchange and that you're selling the sex. <br /><br />Tell me that I'm not attractive enough for free sex, and you need me to pay something extra for you to fuck me, don't lie to my face that your body needs 10 dates to be capable of sex (yet if I'd pulled out a bill, or you met Johnny depp, suddenly it would be capable in 2 minutes flat).Alek Novyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00727239708216696902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-62850697773412537642015-03-07T07:18:53.106-08:002015-03-07T07:18:53.106-08:00I am relatively new to this blog (and enjoying it,...I am relatively new to this blog (and enjoying it, btw), however I do have to speak up about this post since it struck a chord with me. I haven't read all the comments, but there seems to be a striking consensus...that most women are prostitutes. That your average woman, given the right about of money and circumstance, will take payment for sex. This is simply not true. <br /><br />When I was 19 I spent one summer in NYC to study and sight see. I stayed in a hostile run by nuns (the only way I could convince my parents to le me go). Big city life is expensive, so to supplement my savings I took a part time job book keeping for a small clothing store. Knowing it wasn't enough, my boss set me up with his accountant for a job interview, filing and such. The accountant wanted to meet at an outdoor café in Central Park, which I initially thought was a bit strange since every interview I had done was always at the place of employment, but I went along anyway. It turns out, the accountant wanted a girl on the side. He had seen me at the store, said I reminded him of a woman from his teenage years. This woman had essentially dominated him, whips, etc. and was hoping I would do the same. He was pushing 60 and couldn't get these memories out of his head. I was floored. Completely and utterly shocked. I sat in stone silence while he explained in detail what he wanted from me. He offered to pay me a large sum of money, every week. He even tried to give me money at the "interview" which I refused. When he was done talking, I quickly stood up, said "I'll let you know" and left. I dropped all contact with him and even quit the book keeping gig. I remember feeling such burning embarrassment and shame, and I had done nothing wrong. I was terribly disappointed, too, because I really needed a job. I could have very easily taken this guy to the cleaners. I could have demanded more. But because I have morals, integrity and character, I would never have been part of it. <br /><br />Now, I don't tell the is story to make myself sound superior, but to let you know that there are still very good women out there...we just don't make it onto Youtube videos. MTnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-19974722543004277052015-03-02T17:43:43.803-08:002015-03-02T17:43:43.803-08:00@ Geert & Novy:
Just to set some things straig...@ Geert & Novy:<br />Just to set some things straight, which I might have retold slightly superficially with regard to „Sex at dawn“:<br />the basic premise of the book, founded upon scientific evidence and maybe also on sound observation, is that humans are not naturally monogamous creatures (just as other primates aren’t either) and that we still haven’t adapted to the changes which came upon us with agricultural society, the power structures that ensued from it and the often psychologically painful limitations it imposed onto male & female sexuality.<br />Our bodies tell a different story than the „standard narrative“, the often noisy conduct of women during sex does as well, male penis length & testicle position and size, in-depth observations about tribal societies which still exist today etc. pp. (I won’t mention all those relevant aspects, I’m just too lazy).<br />Due to the slow process of evolution we’re still accustomed to live and thrive in smaller units of hordes living in cooperation, sharing and egalitarianism, where the imposed restrictions on male & female sexuality don’t exist any longer (cuz they’re not required). Now that doesn’t mean, that it was all fine and dandy back then. It also doesn’t mean, that women back then would fuck any guy from their tribe, all the time. Certainly back then women also only liked to have sex with guys whom they found attractive and at times, when they felt a horny itch. Either way this would have only applied to a minority of guys, but women could have much freer, to follow their urges without having to lie to others & themselves and to cover up their actions. Since the human species is a a particularly sub-fertile species, even under more promiscuous circumstances it’s not very likely, that such free sexuality would have resulted in a huge rise of tribal population. Natural resources in general in fertile regions of the world were – albeit plentiful – less reliable to be available in larger quantities, which makes it logical to also limit the number of children born and to be fed to a reasonable amount and not ho overboard with it. A sustainable rise of population only becomes possible in agricultural societies.<br /><br />@ Geert: yes, a „patchwork family“ arrangement, where a woman can milk several men in her advantage is of course much more feasible to pull of nowadays. In hunter/gatherer-times the economic incentive within egalitarian societies strictly relying on mutual cooperation within the tribe, such economic incentives just don’t exist. So women just wouldn’t have needed to milk several men and play them out against each other, since they’d and their offspring would be cared for by the entire tribe anyway.<br /><br />I don’t know about „Sex at dusk“, but I’d wager it to be evident, that any research and any conclusions which don’t support traditional monogamy as THE everlasting role-model for making & raising children and structuring society, is of course met with shunned by the established discourse and by people rooted in Christianity as well. The „standard narrative“ is also psychologically closely related to the Judaeo-Christian „creation myth“, which is still so deeply engrained in „Western/European-civilization“, that it’s very hard to not judge evidence by those standards and not to interpret behaviour of a past era according to the memes and standards of our prevalent culture and our times – the authors Ryan/Jetha call this erronous thought process „flintstonization“, e. g. like mistaking the bonding between male & female swans as being the same as human pairbonding among heterosexual humans or considering „rape“ among apes the same as rape among humans.Marco_Polonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-47160764108892803352015-03-02T10:38:12.436-08:002015-03-02T10:38:12.436-08:00I only know a few sponsorettes in real life (at le...I only know a few sponsorettes in real life (at least to my knowledge).<br /><br />But the ones I know were banging older dudes and blowing guys in bathrooms anyway :D Even before anyone offered them money for it. They just seem to like doing it, and money seems to be a bonus - "being offered money for what you do anyway? who'd say no to that".<br /><br />Obviously that's not all sponsorettes, but from what I learned in Uni (I actually had a subject and exam on prostitution)... apparently studies do find that women in this line of work... are above average in sex drive. <br /><br />But that's just an average. Not all sponsorettes/prostitutes have a higher-drive... some might even be asexual in their private life... <br /><br />Its an average because there are different groups of women who get into it. Some get into it because they're naturally super-promiscious (they banged dozens/hundreds of guys for free before they even thought about asking money for it). Others get into it because of other reasons, and don't like the sex (just the money)... so it depends.<br /><br />Alek Novyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00727239708216696902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-25849521042630923482015-03-02T10:31:57.491-08:002015-03-02T10:31:57.491-08:00Oh ok. I think the anonymous was only reffering to...Oh ok. I think the anonymous was only reffering to the linked blog in the comment here when he said that they were nasty low-class fat hoes. <br /><br />Not implying that money only buys you fat skanks - just replying in the context of the linked blog. That's how I read it.Alek Novyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00727239708216696902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-72263467605190072412015-03-02T07:27:21.903-08:002015-03-02T07:27:21.903-08:00The video in the OP.The video in the OP.Aaron Sleazyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06704230661761052919noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-82850735116423856492015-03-02T06:43:05.930-08:002015-03-02T06:43:05.930-08:00Is the woman in the video ugly too, in your opinio...<i>Is the woman in the video ugly too, in your opinion?</i><br /><br />What video are you guys discussing? All I'm seeing is a blog with endless scrolling that has instagram photos of fat skanks bragging about being bought for by arabs?Alek Novyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00727239708216696902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-83099903999230946942015-03-02T06:39:04.503-08:002015-03-02T06:39:04.503-08:00I'm going to go toward the anonymous on this o...I'm going to go toward the anonymous on this one.<br /><br />Yes, the word "ugly" might have been exaggerated... but I find most of those girls unattractive also. They fit in the "kim kardashian" definition of "hot" - which I wouldn't even get a hard-on-for.<br /><br />Most of these are<br /><br />- bodies built like kardashian (personally unattractive to me)<br />- have average faces plastered with tons of make up.<br /><br />So saying they're ugly was an exaggeration (their faces are average, not ugly)... but yeah these are your regular six putting on a lot of fat, some implants and pouring massive amounts of makeup. Then jiggling that fat in tight jeans...<br /><br />There are a few not-fat chicks, but they're also just your average girl who managed to not get fat, then put on a ton of makeup and slutty clothes. <br /><br />There are even a few skinny chicks (with average faces), but none that looks like she's ever worked out in her life. Just skinny with implants.<br /><br />I did see one chick with an above-average (modelling face) who was also skinny... Most aren't that hot (just hot makeup/image).<br /><br />Alek Novyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00727239708216696902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-20002021719545245442015-03-02T02:56:53.310-08:002015-03-02T02:56:53.310-08:00so if a girl is a uni student or phd she is high c...so if a girl is a uni student or phd she is high class?<br /><br />by the way i wont touch the women too ,i mean they are hot but i get a bit<br />disgusted with the 25k for a fuck.LazyLifehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17166776768659209547noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1830949294679547966.post-82522408888408295072015-03-01T16:54:35.980-08:002015-03-01T16:54:35.980-08:00Hey Sleaze, I think I'll just try out your &qu...Hey Sleaze, I think I'll just try out your "haggle"-script for a few times and see how it goes, just for my own bratty amusement:<br />"Ha! Shit, I only have about $700 here. Can we do it for $500 as well?… for 200? 150? 100? Or hey, how about 50?! … whoa, wait – if you agreed to 200 bucks, you could equally as well do it for 100, and if you agreed to 100, it'S not that much of a step to 50, it might do the trick quite as well… or how about YOU pay ME, since I'm gonna service you much better anyway and put a huge smile on your face, than you are gonna to satisfy me…" ***LOL***Marco_Polonoreply@blogger.com