In part I of this article we took a look at how 'betas'. in countries that are being flooded by unskilled illegal immigrants. are going to pay through the nose in order to ensure that the newly arrived and rapidly expanding minority will have their basic needs met. In fact, in many instances they are treated better than the natives. For instance, in Sweden they have the right to free dental care, which natives only have until they turn 18. In Germany they are financially better off than people living off welfare, and get other benefits on top, like free public transport. Just think of everything people were told that there was no money available for: health care, kindergartens, schools, universities, infrastructure, pensions. Yet, now all of a sudden Germany now apparently has billions available to shelter, clothe, and feed about one million illegal migrants who arrived in 2015, and the next million is expected to arrive this year.
Politics is quite depressing, if you think about it. Now you may think that your life is better off if you don't follow the news. There is some appeal to that position. True, if you are content with just paying your taxes, and don't question it, you may prevent feelings of resentments considering what your tax money is being used for. The government does not take your tax money and then inform you that it was used on, say, some incompetent civil servant's fat pension, or on a fresh coat of paint for a rundown school in some derelict neighborhood. Instead, you contribute to a big blob that constitutes the government's tax revenue, they may take out some loans, too, because basic principles of economics apparently don't apply to them, and then they proceed spending it any way they please, even ignoring existing laws like Dublin III. This is happening in Germany, Sweden, Switzerland (the Swiss president decided to let Eritreans in, and now there are about 40,000 who will be impossible to integrate), Austria, and most of the rest of the European Union.
Realizing that your tax money gets wasted on a ton of crap is depressing enough, but, Joe Schmoe, we're not done yet, because presumably you believe in Disney-style romance and just had to get married. But what will happens if, say, the wonderful washed up 38-year old princess you chose to marry and impregnate one day wakes up and realizes that you are not as hot as you are supposed to be, and never were? Needless to say, she hasn't looked sexually appealing for years, if at all. That doesn't matter to her. After all, her bestest girlfriend recently got divorced, and got railed by some "bad boy" who has already moved on to five other women well past their best-before date. Yet, to your princess she makes it sound as if it was such a fabulous experience because being used made her "feel like a woman again". Your girl is therefore pissed, due to inherent competition among females. She also wants her bad boy! Thus, she makes an appointment with a divorce lawyer, of course paid with your credit card.
If things go well, you don't get any false accusations for rape or domestic violence, don't get locked out of your house, and don't get your joint bank account (if you have one of those: Jesus Fucking Christ!) emptied or locked. Instead, she just decides to move out. But, hey, she's not getting her needs met, so who could blame her?
Depending on where you live, your financial situation will now deteriorate somewhat or drastically. She's got your kid. Even if it is not your biological kid, which she may very well have deceived you about, it is nonetheless legally yours. So, open your wallet, beta! It's quite ridiculous how the law is structured in that regard. To quote a friend of mine who recently got divorced, "It's funny how children suddenly get five times more expensive." That guy does not have to pay alimony. However, he is paying a lot of "child support". Unlike what the word might lead you to believe, child support is not just for the child. Instead, in some countries it is so generous that it just so happens that there is quite a bit left over for mom as well. In some legislations child support scales with the guy's income, so the more you make, the more you pay. If this is not discrimination, I would not know what is. It does not take much to either construct examples, or find real-life instances of women who either don't work, or only work part-time, because they are living comparably well off of child support.
Alimony is bullshit on an entirely different level, though. In fact, if you live in a country where alimony laws exist, you are presumably better off not marrying at all. In countries where there is "only" child support, you can at least run the numbers to figure out how much you're willing to pay for love. In the end, an upright, hard-working beta gets doubly fucked: by the tax man, and by alimony/child support laws, which is just another tax in the end.
Those two posts were a bit of a rant, but think about it: while in the 1970s a hard-working regular dude could buy a house and easily pay off a mortgage, today's "young professional" is more likely than not to have significant debt. The only way not to get raped financially is not to marry, not to have kids, and either live in a decent country or live frugally, slowly withering away while the world is sinking into chaos.
What do you think? Let me know in the comments below!
(Also, if you’ve got a comment that is off-topic or only tangentially related to this article, then please post in the most recent Open Thread. Thank you.)